Need Help Writing Assignments? We Got You Covered
Any type of writing takes time, research, knowledge, and patience. For academic assignments, the priority is on the quality and uniqueness of a paper. What happens when you have no time, cannot understand the questions or have too much on your pate? Just reach out for our assignment help for quality and customized papers.
Most students aim for a perfect score. Other than the main exams, assignments may account for 10-30% of the final grade. Unlike exams, you have a better chance of excelling in assignments due to the amount of time and the tools at your disposal. Nevertheless, writing assignments requires the same precision as sitting for an exam. Busy schedules, too many assignments or other engagements such as extracurricular activities or work may limit the time you have to finish a quality assignment. In fact, in some instances, you will have to burn the midnight oil just to catch up with coursework. But this does not have to be the case. Let our assignment helpers reduce your burden and help you score better grades. Assignment help USA makes your work even easier by providing a sample assignment answer that is unique and customized to meet all the requirements.
Types of Assignments You Will Face
Some of the areas or types of assignments you may need help with include:
- Term Papers
- Books or Movie Reviews
- Research Assignment help
- Coursework Projects
- Case Study
- Analytic assignments
- Presentations and speech
- Critical Thinking
Most of our experts in online assignment writing specialize in a particular field. Further, the writers hold undergraduate and graduate degrees. For this reason, you will find help with assignment regardless of the major or nature of the questions.
Hiring the Right Assignment Service
Before enrolling in an assignment service, it is essential to do some background checks. Research online to find out the nitty-gritty of the service. In the meantime, here are some of the questions you should ask:
- Is the service trusted? Are you dealing with professionals, scammers or bots?
- Do you get value for your money?
- What is the quality of the work? Are you better off doing the assignment alone?
- Can the expert deliver the assignment on time or short notice?
Here is the problem, when you type the words “need assignment help,” you will receive numerous results. Separating the best, average, and below average can be a daunting task.
The Following Factors Make Us As A Quality Writing Provider Stand Out
- Quality and exclusive work
- Have strict checks for plagiarism
- 24/7 service provision
- Prioritizes customer satisfaction
- Guarantees a refund in case the work is not satisfactory
- Offer rates that are affordable and within client’s budgets
- You can communicate directly with the expert (assignment helper) to give instructions or additional information
You can read the free samples available on the site to gauge the quality of the work. Alternatively, peruse through customer comments and reviews. Customer reviews tell more about the service provider as they are a first-hand account of the types of services offered.
We Offer Affordable & Perfect Assignment Writing
Once you have the assignment brief, you can sign up to place an order. Writers will present their bids. Before you pick a writer, check customer reviews on the profile. It is advisable to go with one with the highest rating specializing in the field of your assignment and has most favorable rates. At times, you may find suggestions from the site. After you have chosen a writer, make sure you provide all the details of the assignment. Any time your lecturer adds additional information, you can inform the writer. You will need to pay an installment as proof of commitment.
You can request for a part of the assignment to review. If the assignment help is satisfactory, the writer will proceed with the job. But if the job does not meet your standards, you can ask the writer to revise it or reassign the job. You can keep on chatting with the helper to know the progress of your assignment. Once the job you indicated when you said you need help assignment is done, you can pay the full amount. If the writer’s work impresses you can rate and write a review about the service you receive. When you are still not sure about the work, you can request for another revision.
If you need assistance with perfect assignment writing, feel free to engage our experts available. You will get quality, plagiarism free content and submit the work before the deadlines. The samples will enhance your quest to achieve perfect scores.
Do not hesitate! Order now.
On still other important documents, a single official’s name is signed in such radically different ways that some appear to be forgeries. Additional problems have emerged when multiple banks have all argued that they have the right to foreclose on the same property, a result of a murky trail of documentation and ownership.
There is no doubt that the enormous increase in foreclosures in recent years has strained the resources of lenders and their legal representatives, creating challenges that any institution might find overwhelming. According to the Mortgage Bankers Association, the percentage of loans that were delinquent by 90 days or more stood at 9.5 percent in the first quarter of 2010, up from 4 percent in the same period of 2008.
But analysts say that the wave of defaults still does not excuse lenders’ failures to meet their legal obligations before trying to remove defaulting borrowers from their homes.
“It reflects the hubris that as long as the money was going through the pipeline, these companies didn’t really have to make sure the documents were in order,” said Kathleen C. Engel, dean for intellectual life at Suffolk University Law School and an expert in mortgage law. “Suddenly they have a lot at stake, and playing fast and loose is going to be more costly than it was in the past.”
Attorneys general in at least six states, including Massachusetts, Iowa, Florida and Illinois, are investigating improper foreclosure practices. Last week, Jennifer Brunner, the secretary of state of Ohio, referred examples of what her office considers possible notary abuse by Chase Home Mortgage to federal prosecutors for investigation.
The implications are not yet clear for borrowers who have been evicted from their homes as a result of improper filings. But legal experts say that courts may impose sanctions on lenders or their representatives or may force banks to pay borrowers’ legal costs in these cases.
Judges may dismiss the foreclosures altogether, barring lenders from refiling and awarding the home to the borrower. That would create a loss for the lender or investor holding the note underlying the property. Almost certainly, lawyers say, lawsuits on behalf of borrowers will multiply.
In Florida, problems with foreclosure cases are especially acute. A recent sample of foreclosure cases in the 12th Judicial Circuit of Florida showed that 20 percent of those set for summary judgment involved deficient documents, according to chief judge Lee E. Haworth.
“We have sent repeated notices to law firms saying, ‘You are not following the rules, and if you don’t clean up your act, we are going to impose sanctions on you,’ ” Mr. Haworth said in an interview. “They say, ‘We’ll fix it, we’ll fix it, we’ll fix it.’ But they don’t.”
As a result, Mr. Haworth said, on Sept. 17, Harry Rapkin, a judge overseeing foreclosures in the district, dismissed 61 foreclosure cases. The plaintiffs can refile but they need to pay new filing fees, Mr. Haworth said.
The byzantine mortgage securitization process that helped inflate the housing bubble allowed home loans to change hands so many times before they were eventually pooled and sold to investors that it is now extremely difficult to track exactly which lenders have claims to a home.
Many lenders or loan servicers that begin the foreclosure process after a borrower defaults do not produce documentation proving that they have the legal right to foreclosure, known as standing.
As a substitute, the banks usually present affidavits attesting to ownership of the note signed by an employee of a legal services firm acting as an agent for the lender or loan servicer. Such affidavits allow foreclosures to proceed, but because they are often dubiously prepared, many questions have arisen about their validity.
Although lawyers for troubled borrowers have contended for years that banks in many cases have not properly documented their rights to foreclose, the issue erupted in mid-September when GMAC said it was halting foreclosure proceedings in 23 states because of problems with its legal practices. The move by GMAC followed testimony by an employee who signed affidavits for the lender; he said that he executed 400 of them each day without reading them or verifying that the information in them was correct.
JPMorgan Chase and Bank of America followed with similar announcements.
But these three large lenders are not the only companies employing people who have failed to verify crucial aspects of a foreclosure case, court documents show.
Last May, Herman John Kennerty, a loan administration manager in the default document group of Wells Fargo Mortgage, testified to lawyers representing a troubled borrower that he typically signed 50 to 150 foreclosure documents a day. In that case, in King County Superior Court in Seattle, he also stated that he did not independently verify the information to which he was attesting.
A spokesman for Wells Fargo said the bank was confident in its foreclosure policies and practices; he also noted that the judge overseeing the case involving Mr. Kennerty had ruled in favor of the bank.
In other cases, judges are finding that banks’ claims of standing in a foreclosure case can conflict with other evidence.
Last Thursday, Paul F. Isaacs, a judge in Bourbon County Circuit Court in Kentucky, reversed a ruling he had made in August giving Bank of New York Mellon the right to foreclose on a couple’s home. According to court filings, Mr. Isaacs had relied on the bank’s documentation that it said showed it held the note underlying the property in a trust. But after the borrowers supplied evidence indicating that the note may in fact reside in a different trust, the judge reversed himself. The court will revisit the matter soon.
Bank of New York said it was reviewing the ruling and could not comment.
Another problematic case involves a foreclosure action taken by Deutsche Bank against a borrower in the Bronx in New York. The bank says it has the right to foreclose because the mortgage was assigned to it on Oct. 15, 2009.
But according to court filings made by David B. Shaev, a lawyer at Shaev & Fleischman who represents the borrower, the assignment to Deutsche Bank is riddled with problems. First, the company that Deutsche said had assigned it the mortgage, the Sand Canyon Corporation, no longer had any rights to the underlying property when the transfer was supposed to have occurred.
Additional questions have arisen over the signature verifying an assignment of the mortgage. Court documents show that Tywanna Thomas, assistant vice president of American Home Mortgage Servicing, assigned the mortgage from Sand Canyon to Deutsche Bank in October 2009. On assignments of mortgages in other cases, Ms. Thomas’s signatures differ so wildly that it appears that three people signed the documents using Ms. Thomas’s name.
Given the differences in the signatures, Mr. Shaev filed court papers last July contending that the assignment is a sham, “prepared to create an appearance of a creditor as a real party in interest/standing, when in fact it is likely that the chain of title required in these matters was not performed, lost or both.”
Mr. Shaev also asked the judge overseeing the case, Shelley C. Chapman, to order Ms. Thomas to appear to answer questions the lawyer has raised.
John Gallagher, a spokesman for Deutsche Bank, which is trustee for the securitization that holds the note in this case, said companies servicing mortgage loans engaged the law firms that oversee foreclosure proceedings. “Loan servicers are obligated to adhere to all legal requirements,” he said, “and Deutsche Bank, as trustee, has consistently informed servicers that they are required to execute these actions in a proper and timely manner.”
Reached by phone on Saturday, Ms. Thomas declined to comment.
The United States Trustee, a unit of the Justice Department, is also weighing in on dubious court documents filed by lenders. Last January, it supported a request by Silvia Nuer, a borrower in foreclosure in the Bronx, for sanctions against JPMorgan Chase.
In testimony, a lawyer for Chase conceded that a law firm that had previously represented the bank, the Steven J. Baum firm of Buffalo, had filed inaccurate documents as it sought to take over the property from Ms. Nuer.
The Chase lawyer told a judge last January that his predecessors had combed through the chain of title on the property and could not find a proper assignment. The firm found “something didn’t happen that needed to be fixed,” he explained, and then, according to court documents, it prepared inaccurate documents to fill in the gaps.
The Baum firm did not return calls to comment.
A lawyer for the United States Trustee said that the Nuer case “does not represent an isolated example of misconduct by Chase in the Southern District of New York.”
Chase declined to comment.
“The servicers have it in their control to get the right documents and do this properly, but it is so much cheaper to run it through a foreclosure mill,” said Linda M. Tirelli, a lawyer in White Plains who represents Ms. Nuer in the case against Chase. “This is not about getting a free house for my client. It’s about a level playing field. If I submitted false documents like this to the court, I’d have my license handed to me.”Continue reading the main story